Racism Essay -- essays research papers

Attack The Source There really is no way of getting around it. There is a great deal of racial tension in the United States today. Nine out of ten people in society today believe that racism does exist and is something that affects millions of people everyday. There is not much arguing that can done with a statistic like that. What is it that causes so many problems between each other? Is it that we are afraid of the unknown? Whatever the cause is, we have been trying to fix the problem for many years now. Since racism is learned and not genetic, it is something that needs to be taken care of in school starting from the young children. In Brown v. Board of Education, the whole issue was that schools could be segregated only if they were â€Å"equal†. This was decided by the case of Plessy v Ferguson. Schools in the South were not equal so Brown v. Board of Education was filed. Supreme Court Judge Earl Warren decide with the rest of the Supreme Court that segregated schools were in fact unlawful. Schools went through drastic changes but some schools didn’t like the idea. Schools in Prince Edward County had closed due to the ruling and children in the county lost out on their education. This had caused some racism to occur in Prince Edward County. The most effective solution for solving the racial tension problem is to change the curriculum, text books, and to keep up, if not increase, diversity training in the work force today. First of all, there needs to be an agreement that a problem does exist. It is after all evident through racist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazis, and Skinheads. These are hate groups that threaten and dislike people, not for the content of their character, but the color of their skin or what country they are from. although these are extremes when it comes to racism, it is something that affects so many people everyday in the United States. What is racism really? Racism is not knowing anything about someone when you look at them, but disliking them anyway, not because of who they are, but what they are. Racism is cowardly. More importantly, racism is a weakness and an obvious sign of ignorance. So what is it that makes us racist? More than likely, it is the fear of the unknown. In other words, it is a lack of education. The only way to battle this ignorance is to educate oneself. That is why the key to so... ...nor, what would he do? He replied, "I would probably die!" This was the straw that broke the camel's back because a friendship of sixteen years ended at that moment. Parents are the biggest influence in a child's life. Children look to their parents for support and guidance. Without the proper support and guidance, children are headed on a road to nowhere. Racism is not something that will just disappear. But it is possible to minimize it if we keep it under control. Yes we can still teach about unity and equality in our schools, but if we don't attack racism where it begins, then those school programs won't be of any value. Not all children will fall into the category that my former friend fell into. Many children grow up in racist households. My friend was a prime example of someone who couldn't climb the wall of racism but there are many children out there who climb the wall of bigamy every day. The problem of racism isn't a permanent problem. Racism is like a cancer, if it is caught early enough it could be treated but if it is caught too late it could be deadly. Therefore we must attack racism from its source, the household, before it is too late.

Brittle Diabetes Mellitus (BDM)

General Purpose: To inform the audience about the condition, Brittle Diabetes Mellitus Specific Purpose: To provide information on (1) the condition’s factual descriptions and (2) impact to a person’s life Central Idea: The presentation centers on the general description of Diabetes Mellitus, then proceeds in elaborating the actual condition of BDM. Factual description, signs and symptoms, related medical interventions, incidence and the impact of the disease to an individual are the focal points of this presentation.Introduction Attention Strategy: The presentation shall utilize persuasive and factual illustrations of the case to obtain the necessary attention from the audience. The study utilizes an evidenced-based analysis to further the discussion and obtain the attention of the general audience. In addition, it employs real life basis from the medical case of Cathy who died due to severe complications of BDM. Revelation of Topic: The study reveals the danger and co mplexities of the rare type of diabetes, which is BDM.During BDM presentation, the principal revelations include (1) the specific case of BDM and its difference from the typical DM Type 1/Type 2, (2) the increased chances of diabetic complications in BDM than the common DM cases, and (3) medical history of individual who have suffered the case of BDM. Credibility: The credibility of the presentation lies with countless hours of research, references from credible authors and scholarly literatures, academic background on EMT-B, CNA and being a paramedic student, and an experience from an Aunt who died from BDM complications. DiscussionDiabetes Mellitus (DM) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the deficiency or insensitivity of the body to insulin, and exposure of organs to chronic hyperglycemia is the most common medical complication of the disease (DeCherney and Nathan, 2002 p. 326). There are three known types of DM, namely (1) Type-1 or Insulin-Dependent DM (IDDM), (2) Type-2 o r Non-insulin-Dependent DM (NDDM), and (3) Gestational DM (GDM). According to Marso and Stern (2003), these three types of DM are all characterized by the increased sugar levels in the blood (hyperglycemia); however, these are differentiated by their nature of occurrence and etiology.Type-1 occurs due to the genetically impaired insulin receptor that prevents the insulin from binding to these receptors that provide the necessary signal for glucose cellular absorption. Type 2 occurs as a product of acquired metabolic impairment, particularly obesity, that also impairs the binding between insulin and cellular receptors due to extensive distribution of fats. Lastly, GDM occurs during pregnancy as a product of bodily modification, specifically carbohydrate intolerance, on the pregnant mother’s body (Montella, Keely and Lee, 2008 p. 216).These three types of DM are the most commonly known cases; however, a rare type of DM, known as GDM, also occurs to few people. According to Gill (2004), the case of GDM is similar to the manifestations of Type-1 DM although, with increased severity and frequency of occurrence (p. 11). Woodyatt in 1934 uses the term â€Å"brittle† to describe the main characteristic of the disease, which is the oscillation or instantaneous variations of glucose levels. According to mortality rates, the highest prone group is between 25 to 64 years (45%), followed by 65 to 74 age group (22%) and the youngest group of 16 to 44 (16.7%). Patient experiencing this rare DM condition can experience multiple types of severe symptoms, specifically (1) ketoacidosis, (2) hypoglycemia, and (3) hyperglycemia. In the case of BDM, the occurrence of hyperglycemia and/or hypoglycemia can be very sudden and extreme in levels, which consequently makes diagnosis almost impossible due to the unpredictability of its manifestations. Ketoacidosis occurs during an extreme drop of insulin levels in the body that consequently increases blood sugar contents in t he body making it thick in consistency (Backer, 2005 p. 201).In addition, ketoacidosis occurs in a very unstable levels and unpredictable frequency. BDM can be very hard to control due to the severe swings on blood sugar levels. Medical practitioners commonly advice exercise, careful monitoring of diet and blood glucose levels at least every 30 minutes for the first 5 hours of BDM manifestations (Ballanoff, Yu and Stjernholm, 2004 p. 132). Signs and symptoms that need to be carefully monitored are fruity breath, dehydration, increased thirst, severe and instantaneous weight loss due to muscle wasting and increased frequency of urination (polyuria).Meanwhile, severe complications that can result include (1) kidney damage due to nephropathy, (2) hypertension and heart damages (e. g. Cardiomegaly, Cardiac arrest, etc. ), (3) eye damage (e. g. glaucoma, cataracts, retinopathy, etc. ), (4) diabetic neuropathy affecting nerve functioning that eventually leads to leg and feet necrosis, GI peristaltic-related indigestion and impotence (erectile dysfunction), and (5) series of life-threatening conditions, such as hyperlipidemia, atherosclerosis and diabetic coma (Ballanoff, Yu and Stjernholm, 2004 p.132-133). One of the historically recognized records of BDM case is Cathy who was born in September 21, 1961 and eventually diagnosed with type 2 DM at the age of 20. Despite of different medical opinions and treatments on controlling her sugar levels, her blood sugar had continued to oscillate. In 1999, she had her child named, Sam, but her body rejected the baby during pregnancy due to severe diabetic complications. Things started going bad in the year 2000 as she was diagnosed with stroke and developed severe neuropathy on her feet.As the years passed by, she had experienced BDM complications, such as heart attack in 2002, leg venous blockage in 2003 that eventually ended in surgery, and complete irreversible neck vein blockage in 2005. In 2007, Cathy had a stroke that d estroyed almost all parts of her brain except for the remaining quarter piece of her brainstem. She lived for three days after the incident, and on May 22, 2007, Cathy’s body finally gave from the complications of BDM. ConclusionIn conclusion, BDM is indeed a rare but tremendously life-threatening condition. Considering the standard DM treatments available, Diagnosis and treatment are both hard to administer due to the unpredictable and extreme drops or rise of blood sugar in the body. The most common manifestations of BDM include severe hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis. If these conditions pursue, minor complications, such as polyuria, dehydration, thirstiness, etc, can lead to more severe conditions, such as hypertension, heart problems, diabetic coma, etc.To avoid these complications, medical experts had to suggest frequent blood sugar monitoring, diet restrictions and exercise. One of the recorded cases of severe BDM is the progressive diabetic complications o f Cathy. She first developed Type 2 DM indications at the age of 20. The doctors diagnosed her condition as BDM due to unpredictable and extreme rise of blood glucose levels. She was able to live a life of a common DM patient until her failed pregnancy in 2000, which eventually developed in severe BDM complications.She died on May 22, 2007 due to the massive stroke that nearly damaged her entire brain. References Backer, H. D. (2005). Wilderness First Aid: Emergency Care for Remote Locations. New York, U. S. A: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Ballonoff, L. , Yu, W. , & Stjernholm, M. (2004). What to Do When the Doctor Says It's Diabetes: The Most Important Things You Need to Know about Blood Sugar, Diet, and Exercise for Type I and Type II Diabetes. Tennessee, New Jersey: Fair Winds Press. DeCherney, A. H., & Nathan, L. (2002). Current Obstetric and Gynecologic Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, U. S. A: McGraw-Hill Professional. Gill, G. (2004). Unstable and Brittle Diabetes. Chicago, U. S. A: Informa Health Care. Marso, S. P. , & Stern, D. M. (2003). Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Integrating Science and Clinical Medicine. New York, U. S. A: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Montella, K. , Keely, E. , & Lee, R. V. (2008). Medical Care of the Pregnant Patient. London, New York: ACP Press.

Net Neutrality Contrasting And Opposing Views - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1454 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/04/11 Category Society Essay Level High school Topics: Net Neutrality Essay Did you like this example? According to the American Library Association net neutrality is defined as the principle that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. So, with this principle Internet Service Providers can not restrict, impair or degrade any network speed or traffic on the foundation of content , application, services or mobile devices. For example, Netflix, YouTube, Hulu all do the same exact thing so with the net neutrality principle put in place Netflix cannot interfere with any of the companys internet traffic by favoring their source and company and limiting access to the others.. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Net Neutrality: Contrasting And Opposing Views" essay for you Create order If they were to do that it would be stopping the free flow of information and would basically disrupt the rights of the individual to be able to participate in public discourse and the full functioning of a library. Basically, net neutrality is the federal government, along with the FCC, stepping in and regulating the price that the internet service provider can charge companies for sending data over the internet. Just like any other limited resource the laws of supply and demand and the fair market would determine the price of the commodity. Scott Cleland from Net Competition said that net neutrality legislations mean less privacy for all Americans, as Net neutrality would require more government monitoring and surveillance of Internet traffic. The principle of net neutrality can be compared to the way you would use electricity in your home. You do not pay your power company a blender fee just so you can plug in your blender , or a light bulb fee just so you can turn on your lights (Gordon; Ammori). Likewise, net neutrality states that ISPs cannot charge for the privilege to use specific programs or services (Ammori). Scott Cleland and Net Competition argue that Americans would suffer a loss of privacy. So, if net neutrality was not in place the government will have to start looking a bit closer at network traffic, in order to enforce a neutral internet. Contrasting and/or opposing views Pro-Net Neutrality Most consumers who are pro- net neutrality argue that all data should be treated equally in terms of pricing and access and that providers shouldnt have a say over what content passes through their company. They also argue that Net Neutrality places us in a world where a phone company could very well degrade or interfere with your connection if they do not approve of the person you are calling. Although it may seem impossible because of the principle of net neutrality is in place, but it is very well possible. In terms of resources, the pro-Net Neutrality crowd argues its elimination stifles innovation and stops small businesses and startups from obtaining an equal position with larger companies which have more resources. In a pro- Net Neutrality world, its conceivable internet providers could offer upgrade speeds and broader access to companies that have the resources to pay for faster delivery which in the end would stifle access for smaller businesses. Anti-Net Neutrality However, those consumers against Net Neutrality argue that things have changed since the early days of the internet which is very true because the internet has expand. Eventually as time went on there are companies like Netflix and YouTube who required a large amount of bandwidth to provide their service. There are file sharing services consuming huge embrace of bandwidth to provide millions of downloads of free software, movies and music. With this in mind there are the Googles and the Skypes of the world that offer bandwidth-consuming free phone services. According to Forbes.com net neutrality naysayers argue that content providers and consumers should pay their fair share pointing out that those entities that use vast quantities of bandwidth shouldnt get away with paying the same access fees as a website with 15 visitors a month. For ISPs who are anti-Net Neutrality, suppress takes on a different meaning., They argue that Net Neutrality suppressed innovation because it did not allow for the small or big businesses potential to increase in revenue from higher data consuming companies which would, in time, provide the necessary revenue to offer better and new kinds of internet services. Pros of Net Neutrality Net Neutrality is a very controversial topic because there are an equal number of pros and cons. Here are some reasons why net neutrality is a good idea. First it creates an equal playing field which means with this principle in place Internet Service Providers (ISPs) only have a little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by customers to access the internet. However, there are controls in place for illegal activity but companies like T- Mobile and Direct Tv have no right to change how their data package is delivered to them. Second it protects innovation, so this means each company big or small were able to start at the same level in fact big companies still have the same access as small businesses or freelancers, which then gives them an acceptable earning to live off of comfortably. Third it gives the customer the freedom of expression. This is good because it gives various of websites the right to operate legally and there isnt any censorship as long as they me et their legal obligation. Lastly illegal activities will still be monitored reason for this because with net neutrality put in place it still gives the government and the FCC a way to still protect the consumer. Cons of Net Neutrality Equally important just as there are pros to any given situation there are always cons as well. Here are few examples of what not having net neutrality can do. First one is the enormous amounts of data are consumed without compensation. Second one is reduced income from internet uses limits infrastructure. So, if net neutrality were to be removed these high-level consumers would be asked to pay more for what they consume. There are so many cons to this topic because it affects a lot more than just companies it also affects college students. As a college student we only get a certain amount of money from the government to go to school. So, there for we cannot afford to sit here and pay for the internet something that is supposed to be free and open for everyone to use for their own usage. A few other examples are free internet access will go away which means no college student can go on the internet freely to do any homework assignments or tasks given by the teacher lastly more regulat ions would also create slower access which is a bad thing for any college students who take online classes or who even just uses it for class because it will prevent them from getting their work done and hinder them academically. Analysis of views College students being able to have access to the internet is extremely important .Without it we could not study for class , do any academic research or even just use it for general usage. Unrestrained access to the internet is also very important to students who do take home assignments and use their own internet access. Of course, without a neutrality rule put in place students will feel the impact because it would cause complications for students who need to use the internet on a daily basis. In addition, most college students who already have a horrible connection at home could be strongly impacted by net neutrality getting repealed. If it is repealed it could hinder the students ability to be able to complete simple assignment tasks such as taking a test, studying for an exam or turning in any assignments online. Proposed Issue Resolution With doing this topic you began to realize they are both wanting the same thing just in different ways. Never have they once took the time out to really put their selves in the consumers shoes or the ISPs shoes because they feel like they matter. With ever websites I have looked at I have yet to see any facts laid out on the page, in fact everything I seen were just opinons on how the other feels about net Neutrality. I can give you a clear example of what I am saying, take the iPhone and Galaxy phones many people in the world have their opinons on each phone by themselves. But thats all they are just opinons their trying to find a way to persuade you to get whichever phone its the same thing with pro and anti-Net neutrality they are just trying to get the government and or consumers to join their side in order for their side to seem more favorable.